Sample flsa interrogatories to defendant

Sample flsa interrogatories to defendant

sample flsa interrogatories to defendant Under Rule 33 and Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the absence of any court imposed limits a party may serve interrogatories and document requests on any other party. The City argued that it paid overtime in compliance with the Agreement and that Section 7 g 3 of the FLSA allows the parties by agreement or understanding to establish a basic rate to be multiplied by a factor of not less than one 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In answering these interrogatories you must furnish all information which is available to Litigation What Defendants Can Request and Obtain from Plaintiffs. The defendant may serve discovery on a random sample of fifteen percent of the FLSA opt in class members. Here are an example of pattern interrogatories for defamation plaintiff to defendant Definitions The term quot publication quot as used in these interrogatories refers to the actual act of speaking writing printing distributing broadcasting showing or otherwise conveying the allegedly defamatory communication. PLAINTIFF 39 S INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT Plaintiff requests that each defendant separately answer the following interrogatories under oath pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS A. Kan. Patton Nicholas H. for a defendant to challenge the sufficiency of the alleged trade secrets. Please identify each and every person that has assisted you in responding to these interrogatories. 324 McCormick v. Do you have any claims against Defendant other than those arising out of the Account 1. See full list on lexisnexis. Defendant s Name Docket Number INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF Ans. a corporation SYBARIS VENTURES ONE LLC a corporation to be answered within 28 days 1. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33 allows a party to serve up to 25 interrogatories. It can be really daunting to receive a list of interrogatories to answer. The Plaintiff asks that the Defendants answer the interrogatories and document requests within twenty eight 28 days of service appending the requested documents to those Answers. 2 Plaintiff provided Defendant with Plaintiff s analysis of the potential maximum liability if all AppC Special Interrogatories For Cases brought by Prisoners Prison Litigation Reform Applies SECURITIES ACT INSTRUCTIONS 6. On October 2 2006 Defendant filed a single global objection to Plaintiff s Interrogatories and failed to otherwise respond to said request. The interrogatories must be answered in writing within 30 days the requested documents must be produced within 30 days. The answer to Interrogatories shall be made under oath by Plaintiff separately and fully in writing on or before the 30th day after receipt of such Interrogatories and shall be delivered to Defendant. 9 If defendant contends that some other person or legal entity is in whole or in part liable to the plaintiff or defendant in this matter state the full name address and telephone number of such person or entity and describe in detail the basis of such liability. 1 SELARZ LAW CORP. No opt in class member will be allowed to testify at trial unless first responding to the discovery discussed in paragraph 2 above. prays that the Court GRANT his request for leave and allow him to serve an additional 10 special interrogatories on Defendant Cisco Systems Inc. DISCUSSION I. These sample interrogatories for unlawful detainer eviction in California are designed to be used by a defendant in an eviction case particularly an eviction after foreclosure. Please state the name address and job title of each employee or agent of this Defendant who is directly above or supervisory to the employee s or agent s identified in the previous Interrogatory. Between April 2015 and January 2016 Plaintiffs and Defendants each served and responded to written discovery including document requests form and special interrogatories and requests for admission and each produced several hundred pages of responsive documents. 6 Defendant seeks the following information 15 Id. 203 d . Defendants and their attorneys tend to use the same standard form interrogatories in all cases so these examples should give you a good idea of what to expect. 26 2014 rejecting a proposed FLSA settlement agreement in part because it contained a provision restricting the plaintiff s attorney from representing any person bringing similar claims against Defendants because s uch a provision raises the specter of defendants settling FLSA P. That means for example the defense must provide all information from all available sources 4 even that ob tained from experts 5 without respect to the burden of proof 6 and may require investigation. the Western District of Pennsylvania affirmed costs in favor of the defendants and against the three named Plaintiffs and defendant moved for summary judgment on the issue of the City 39 s liability under the FLSA. 9 11 26 and 9 11 33 and to serve your responses upon Defendant 39 s counsel Larry C. 83 1942 and that the claimant is covered by the FLSA Englert v. ca. The sample on which this preview is based is 17 pages and includes brief instructions sample interrogatories a declaration for additional discovery and proof of Respondent Defendant . lawyer responses to plaintiffs First Sets of Interrogatories and Requests for Production served on November 3 2016. x CASE NO. 14 Interrogatories are prohibited in juvenile delinquency cases. 201 et seq. defendant name of defendant Defendant. State the full name of the defendant answering as well as your current residence address date of birth marital status driver 39 s license number and issuing state and the last four digits of your social security number and if different give the full name as well as the Demand is hereby made of Defendant Thorn Americas Inc. 13 and 14 properly seek the identification through the provision of employees names addresses and telephone numbers of all employees who performed similar duties to Plaintiff and who have been compensated in a similar manner to Plaintiff while working for Defendant during the relevant two 2 year and three 3 year defendant Consumer Defendant action Case No. 3 The Fair Labor Standards Act quot FLSA quot defines quot employer quot to include quot any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee quot 29 U. Identify all correspondence between plaintiff and the defendant or its representatives and attach copies. to defendant in the above styled action . and Maxus Energy Corporation interrogatories shall not be used for any improper purpose. The interrogatories requested information on damages causation and the existence of a loan commitment. Source NJ Court Rules Appendix II Interrogatory Forms Form A 2 4. INSTRUCTIONS . The defendant did not object to the use of a general verdict form that simply asked was there negligence on the part of the defendant that was the legal cause of injuries to the plaintiff. 1. Denied. 5 Id. b of goods for commerce within the meaning of Section 3 s 1 A of the Fair Labor Standards Act 29 U. Too Many Interrogatories. Ajami Esq. The injured plaintiff might serve interrogatories on the defendant driver seeking information that would support the plaintiff 39 s theory of the case. Plaintiff s hereby make demand that the Defendant s answer the following Interrogatories pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure 4001 et seq. Amended by 292 So. Jim s Concrete of Brevard Inc. California Civil Litigation and Discovery Litigation By The Numbers Substantive Companion Ninth Edition January 2018 Julie A. DEFINITIONS A. Related Articles from around the web 256 . 213 b . 216 b . Plaintiff 39 s Interrogatories To Defendant. Defendants served Plaintiffs with Defendants First Set of Interrogatories First Requests for Production and First Requests for Admission exclusively regarding Plaintiffs jurisdictional allegations on June 21 2016. NOTICE I. Note there are limits on the number of interrogatories that may be sent to another party in the lawsuit. The interrogatories that follow are designed to elicit the facts relating to defendant s claim that the collision was the result of an unavoidable accident rather than operator negligence. Fill in only the Question section and the other side will fill in the Answers. 4. WHEREAS Defendant filed an Answer denying the material allegations of the initial Complaint on June 13 2012 and a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff s Time Barred Clams and Strike Certain Class Allegations. CASE NO. Sample interrogatories for defense counsel to use when drafting an initial set of interrogatories to a plaintiff in an administrative exemption misclassification case under the Fair Labor Standards Act FLSA in federal district court. docx response to form interrogatories construction litigation form interrogatory no. Nor does Plaintiff DEFENDANT S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST INTERROGATORIES Page 5 6. No. 6 If Defendant contends that any act or omission alleged to have given rise to Plaintiffs 39 claim for failure to pay overtime under the FLSA as more specifically set forth in Plaintiff 39 s Original Complaint and any subsequent Amended Complaints was in good faith and based on a reasonable belief that Defendant was in Write your Interrogatories. This memorandum is intended to assist trial attorneys in preparing for and conducting interviews of charging parties and other claimants on the question of whether to seek nonpecuniary compensatory damages as provided in the Civil Rights Act of 1991 42 U. And the defendant can point out that it would have found even more distinctions and variations had it been permitted broader discovery and that a trial of the collective action would Defendants in Lead Paint Cases These are court approved non standard interrogatories and requests for production. ONE Defendant Cross Defendant COURTNEY INC. The Defendant paid the Plaintiff and the putative class an hourly rate for each hour worked. Pursuant to Rule 2 421 you are required to answer the following interrogatories within 30 days or within the time otherwise required by court order or by the Maryland Rules Interrogatories by plaintiff seeking to find out the scope of the defense are proper Perhaps defendant s real objection is that it is a difficult question to answer and requires a present decision on the position that he will take at the trial. Preliminary Information to Seek from the Employer The types of information that your client is likely to or should have include The employee s personnel file including any contract or agreement signed by the employee performance reviews A private plaintiff claiming entitlement to minimum wages or overtime pay has the burden of proving that the claimant either is or was employed by the defendant Warren Bradshaw Drilling Co. 509 Barbee v. 1 respond to the following interrogatories. DEFENDANT Comes the Defendant University of Kentucky by counsel and for its Answers to the Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories states as follows INTERROGATORY NO. Exs. 16. Sample Interrogatories 1. Does anyone have a sample Request for Interrogatories that they could share with me or possibly share the link to one. IL Supreme Court R. 691 2003 . By providing information in response to these Interrogatories Plaintiff does not concede the accuracy of Defendant s definitions assumptions or allegations. 13 Product Liability Request for Documents to Defendant. I am the plaintiff. 39 203 s 1 A . This Court has original federal question jurisdiction under 28 U. 5. quot Aeronca quot 1 answer fully in Defendant from whom Plaintiff asked for assistance after her fall on January 31 2009. S7 a and this court 39 s Order of May 13 2014 Defendant State of Maine quot State quot has filed a Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories that is opposed by Plaintiff John F. Created Date 6 20 2008 11 55 44 AM Sample interrogatories for employer 39 s counsel to use when drafting an initial set of interrogatories to a plaintiff in a Fair Labor Standards Act FLSA tip pooling or tip credit case in federal district court. interrogatories furnish such information as is available to you not merely such information as is of your own knowledge. State your full name your present address and date of birth. address 2. RESPONSE 5. 2 Documents that Defendant must produce to Plaintiff. INTERROGATORIES SET ONE Defendants. E Defendant ORDER ON DEFENDANT 39 S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES . A plaintiff in a Fair Labor Standards Act case 29 U. The Plaintiff through the undersigned attorney responds to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories as follows General Objections 1. The defendants are PennyMac Financial Services Inc. Ans. 070. ANSWER 2. 20530 within 30 days of service of these Interrogatories. If you claim that the defendant made any admissions as to the subject matter of this The undersigned pro se defendant or attorney for the defendant certifies pursuant to KCLR 33 b and c that these interrogatories are approp riate to the facts of this case and are identical in substance to the Pattern Interrogatories approved by the King County Superior Court. 11 Premises Liability Request for Production of Documents to Defendant. Case 3 13 cv 01461 G Document 8 Filed 04 25 13 Page 5 of 9 PageID 186 IV. 1. ANSWER 5. A true and correct copy of the response is attached hereto as Exhibit 4. 11. Malin 5 Blkf. 1331 interrogatories. Write simple questions that may help you prove or defend your case. 29 USC 213 b 27 . Litigation What Defendants Can Request and Obtain from Plaintiffs. 151 11. Rule 33 a 4 . interrogatories were served in good faith is unworkable. 97 and that the amount is not subject to turnover pursuant to 11 U. The Plaintiff has not responded or has not fully responded to Defendant s requests. Defendants 2 amp 3 who had previously filed motions to quash service withdrew those motions and filed demurrers without a prior meet and confer. 287555 dselarz selarzlaw. The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Defendant 39 s Objections to Plaintiff 39 s Interrogatories was sent by ordinary U. State the country and state of incorporation of the defendant employer and the date of the defendant employer 39 s incorporation. Vardimaa 2 Blkf. Motion to Dismiss In considering defendant 39 s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction the court must accept View Plaintiff s Special Interrogatories Sample. Justin M. Based on this language and FLSA 216 b paul sample .